Fuzzy Delphi-based Assessment of Privacy-Aware Healthcare Monitoring Architectures in Remote and Resource-Constrained Areas

Sami Shaffiee Haghshenas; Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas; Giuseppe Guido; Francesco Longo; Vittorio Astarita

doi:10.31181/dma412026194

Authors

Sami Shaffiee Haghshenas Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, Via Bucci, 87036 Rende, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9301-8677
Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, Via Bucci, 87036 Rende, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-3920
Giuseppe Guido Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, Via Bucci, 87036 Rende, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-4123
Francesco Longo Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Italy, Via Bucci, 87036 Rende, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8538-9857
Vittorio Astarita Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, Via Bucci, 87036 Rende, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3673-9814

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/dma412026194

Keywords:

Intelligent Healthcare Monitoring, Remote Communities, Healthcare Data, Fuzzy Delphi-based Framework, Digital Connectivity

Abstract

Intelligent healthcare monitoring in geographically isolated communities requires solutions that can operate under limited digital infrastructure while maintaining privacy, regulatory compatibility, and public confidence. Selecting an appropriate system architecture is therefore particularly important in areas where connectivity and computational resources are not always reliable. This study develops a fuzzy Delphi-based framework to assess and rank five privacy-aware healthcare monitoring architectures for such environments. Expert judgments were collected for the candidate architectures and processed through the fuzzy Delphi procedure to derive consensus-based fuzzy scores and establish their final priorities. The framework was applied to the Calabria region in Southern Italy, where dispersed settlements and uneven digital connectivity provide a relevant setting for examining healthcare monitoring solutions designed for remote communities. The findings identified "edge-based local processing" (A2) as the most suitable architecture, with a final weight of 0.4, followed by "differential privacy–enhanced platforms" (A5) with a weight of 0.25. "Federated learning architectures" (A3) is ranked third (0.18), while "Blockchain-enabled monitoring" (A4) (0.09) and "centralized AI monitoring" (A1) (0.05) occupied the fourth and fifth positions, respectively. The ranking indicates a clear preference for architectures that reduce dependence on continuous connectivity and limit the external transmission of sensitive healthcare data. Comparison with results reported in previous assessments showed a high level of agreement in the relative priorities of the alternatives, providing additional support for the consistency of the proposed fuzzy Delphi-based evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ongesa, T. N., Ugwu, O. P. C., Ugwu, C. N., Alum, E. U., Eze, V. H. U., Basajja, M., ... & Ejemot-Nwadiaro, R. I. (2025). Optimizing emergency response systems in urban health crises: A project management approach to public health preparedness and response. Medicine, 104(3), e41279. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041279.

[2] Ugwu, C. N., Ugwu, O. P. C., Alum, E. U., Eze, V. H. U., Basajja, M., Ugwu, J. N., ... & Uti, D. E. (2025). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) and resilient healthcare systems: Addressing medicine and public health challenges in conflict zones. Medicine, 104(7), e41535. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041535.

[3] Qiu, Y., & Hu, Z. (2025). Data governance and open sharing in the fields of life sciences and medicine: A bibliometric analysis. Digital Health, 11, 20552076251320302. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251320302.

[4] Okafor, S., Adanu, E. K., Lidbe, A., & Jones, S. (2023). Severity analysis of single-vehicle left and right run-off-road crashes using a random parameter ordered logit model. Traffic Injury Prevention, 24(3), 251-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2023.2174376.

[5] Nabha, R., Laouiti, A., & Samhat, A. E. (2025). Internet of Things-based healthcare systems: An overview of privacy-preserving mechanisms. Applied Sciences, 15(7), 3629. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073629.

[6] Gao, Y., Huang, X., Ni, H., Dong, Y., & Feng, C. (2026). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Smart Homecare: A Review of Applications, Challenges, and Prospects. Challenges, and Prospects (January 27, 2026). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6167427.

[7] Han, C., & Zang, S. (2025). A comprehensive review of disruptive technologies in disaster risk management of smart cities. Climate Risk Management, 48, 100703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100703.

[8] Smallwood, C., Matos, C., Monteiro, H., Shapiro, M., Ngoc, M. T., Elamein, M., ... & Petragallo, S. (2025). Enhancing information for action: a strategic tool for strengthening public health emergency management systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 196, 105791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105791.

[9] Ahmad, I., Asghar, Z., Kumar, T., Li, G., Manzoor, A., Mikhaylov, K., ... & Harjula, E. (2022). Emerging technologies for next generation remote health care and assisted living. IEEE Access, 10, 56094-56132. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3177278.

[10] Azad, M. A., Arshad, J., Mahmoud, S., Salah, K., & Imran, M. (2022). A privacy‐preserving framework for smart context‐aware healthcare applications. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 33(8), e3634. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.3634.

[11] González-Baldovinos, D. L., Sánchez-Fernández, L. P., Cano-Rosas, J. L., López-Chau, A., & Guevara-López, P. (2025). Innovations and technological advances in healthcare remote monitoring systems for the elderly and vulnerable people: A scoping review. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3200. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063200.

[12] Perez, K., Wisniewski, D., Ari, A., Lee, K., Lieneck, C., & Ramamonjiarivelo, Z. (2025). Investigation into application of AI and telemedicine in rural communities: a systematic literature review. Healthcare, 13(3), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030324.

[13] Grgurić, A., Mošmondor, M., & Huljenić, D. (2019). The SmartHabits: an intelligent privacy-aware home care assistance system. Sensors, 19(4), 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040907.

[14] Anwar, M., Joshi, J., & Tan, J. (2015). Anytime, anywhere access to secure, privacy-aware healthcare services: Issues, approaches and challenges. Health Policy and Technology, 4(4), 299-311. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.hlpt.2015.08.007.

[15] Haghshenas, S. S., Haghshenas, S. S., Guido, G., Longo, F., & Astarita, V. (2026). Prioritizing Privacy-Aware Intelligent Monitoring Systems for Remote Communities Using Fuzzy Decision-Making. In 2026 12th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT) (pp. 1912-1916). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoDIT70676.2026.11630968.

[16] Ghanizadeh, A. R., Ziaee, A., Khatami, S. M. H., & Fakharian, P. (2022). Predicting resilient modulus of clayey subgrade soils by means of cone penetration test results and back-propagation artificial neural network. Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 10(4), 146-162. https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2022.25013.1568.

[17] Mimi, M. S., Islam, M. M., Sheykhfard, A., & Das, S. (2025). Crash risk patterns among older bicyclists: Insights from hybrid XGBoost-Cluster Correspondence Analysis. Journal of Safety Research, 95, 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2025.10.009.

[18] Haghshenas, S. S., Haghshenas, S. S., Astarita, V., & Guido, G. (2025). Fuel consumption and CO₂ emissions prediction in road transport using a hybrid deep learning approach. Transportation Engineering, 21, 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2025.100364.

[19] Zhang, Z. Q., Wu, F. C., Qian, B., Hu, R., Wang, L., & Jin, H. P. (2023). A Q-learning-based hyper-heuristic evolutionary algorithm for the distributed flexible job-shop scheduling problem with crane transportation. Expert Systems with Applications, 234, 121050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121050.

[20] Liu, Y., Alsaleh, R., & Sayed, T. (2024). Modelling motorized and non-motorized vehicle conflicts using multiagent inverse reinforcement learning approach. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 12(1), 2314762. https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2024.2314762.

[21] Ekici, Ü., Akay, M. E., & Moslem, S. (2026). Determination of logistics center locations in Türkiye using AHP-based TOPSIS methods. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 37, 101967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2026.10196.

[22] Moslem, S., Gündoğdu, F. K., Saylam, S., & Pilla, F. (2024). A hybrid decomposed fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for optimizing parcel lockers location in the last-mile delivery landscape. Applied Soft Computing, 154, 111321 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111321.

[23] Brodny, J., Tutak, M., & Bindzár, P. (2024). Measuring and assessing the level of living conditions and quality of life in smart sustainable cities in poland—Framework for evaluation based on MCDM methods. Smart Cities, 7(3), 1221-1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7030052.

[24] Saffari, A., Sereshki, F., Ataei, M., & Ghanbari, K. (2017). Presenting an engineering classification system for coal spontaneous combustion potential. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 4(2), 110-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-017-0160-7.

[25] Guido, G., Haghshenas, S. S., Haghshenas, S. S., Vitale, A., Gallelli, V., & Astarita, V. (2022). Prioritizing the potential smartification measures by using an Integrated decision support system with sustainable development goals (a case study in southern Italy). Safety, 8(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety8020035.

[26] Gecchele, G., Ceccato, R., Rossi, R., & Gastaldi, M. (2023). A flexible approach to select road traffic counting locations: system design and application of a fuzzy Delphi analytic hierarchy process. Transportation Engineering, 12, 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2023.10016.

[27] Haghighat, M., & Mousavi, S. M. (2024). Identifying and ranking of the main organizational resilience indicators in the hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study using fuzzy Delphi technique (FDT) and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). Heliyon, 10(5). e27241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27241.

[28] Huynh-Xuan, T., Bui, N., Ngo-Thanh, T., Nguyen, D. T., Thi Binh, A. D., & Le Thi Cam, H. (2024). Adopting construction 4.0 to promote sustainability in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam: a fuzzy delphi study. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 41(4), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2024.2315942.

[29] Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1988). Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science (pp. 1-332). Elsevier Science Inc., New York, United States. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/576010.

[30] Mikaeil, R., Ozcelik, Y., Yousefi, R., Ataei, M., & Hosseini, S. M. (2013). Ranking the sawability of ornamental stone using Fuzzy Delphi and multi-criteria decision-making techniques. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 58, 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.09.002.

[31] Davarzani, M. R., Ataei, M., & Sereshki, F. (2025). Flyrock risk assessment in blasting operations of road construction in hard rock using the FFTA-FDAHP method. Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences, 17(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.57647/j.ijes.2025.1702.16.

[32] Anjum, N. N., Sumathi, S., Dhayalan, R. D., Rampavithran, R. P., Anand, A. J., & Sathiyanarayanan, M. (2025). Smart sensors for smart city environmental monitoring systems. In Digital twin, blockchain, and sensor networks in the healthy and mobile city (pp. 17-33). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-34174-8.00003-X.

[33] Jain, A., & Babu, K. A. (2025). Reviewing the Green Building Concepts Along with the Applications of AI and IoT for Environmental Monitoring and Designing Sustainable Infrastructures. Journal of Informatics & Mathematical Sciences, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.26713/jims.v17i1.3056.

[34] Waqar, A., Nisar, S., Muddassir, M., & Benjeddou, O. (2025). An integrated management system (IMS) approach to sustainable construction development and management. Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience, 4(1), 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iintel.2024.100126.

[35] Hudda, S., & Haribabu, K. (2025). A review on WSN based resource constrained smart IoT systems. Discover Internet of Things, 5(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43926-025-00152-2.

[36] Mahmmod, B. M., Naser, M. A., Al-Sudani, A. H. S., Alsabah, M., Mohammed, H. J., Alaskar, H., ... & Abdulhussain, S. H. (2024). Patient monitoring system based on internet of things: A review and related challenges with open research issues. IEEE Access, 12, 132444-132479. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3455900.

[37] Mouhim, S. A. N. A. A., & Lachhab, F. A. D. W. A. (2025). Towards a context awareness system using IoT, AI, and big data technologies. IEEE Access, 13, 40302–40315. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3546865.